use of isced:level and addr:full

[govvin]

In the the proposal page for isced:level=xxx key, the values for levels are supposed to be numeric.

In this import, you have these values as primary or secondary, where they should be as 1 or 2, respectively. Also note that kindergartens may also be tagged as isced:level = 0

I'm curious about your use of addr:full with a value that duplicates the addr:subdistrict key and the addr:district that duplicates addr:province Based on the image above, the field value should have been just addr:full = Titihue, Huancane

In the following case:

The value could be addr:full = Azangaro, Chupa, Caminocoya, or often in the format <housenumber> <street address> <neighbourhood> <town> <zipcode> <country>

I'm familiar with these keys because I have a similar import in the pipeline, and appreciate the value of these imports add to the map, and their importance to the community. I'm curious with your use case.

[Rub21]

cc. @dannykath

[dannykath]

Hey @govvin, sorry for my late response, I checked your comments and I have some comments:

In the proposal page for isced:level=xxx key, the values for levels are supposed to be numeric.
In this import, you have these values as primary or secondary, where they should be as 1 or 2, respectively. Also note that kindergartens may also be tagged as isced:level = 0

According to schema, we have considerated 3 levels : Initial, primary and secondary.
Yes, you are right , thanks for the observation 🙇‍♀️ We will check and change the tag according to the following schema: 👇

Level	Old value	Should be
initial	missing	isced:level= 0
primary	isced:level= primary	isced:level=1
secondary	isced:level= secondary	isced:level = 2

I think we can fix this one run a query using overpass for initial level, primary and secondary and change the data for avoid this issue 👍

I'm curious about your use of addr:full with a value that duplicates the addr:subdistrict key and the addr:district that duplicates addr:province Based on the image above, the field value should have been just addr:full = Titihue, Huancane

According to data of INEI , the political division has 4 levels : Department, province, district and populated center and in openstreetmap does not exist populated center, and this was the reason because we use addr:subdistrict for populated centers.
You can check the list of populated center here
Example :

I'm curious about your use of addr:full with a value that duplicates the addr:subdistrict key and the addr:district that duplicates addr:province Based on the image above, the field value should have been just addr:full = Titihue, Huancane
The value could be addr:full = Azangaro, Chupa, Caminocoya, or often in the format

I don’t have enough information about the 👉 addr:full = Azangaro, Chupa, Caminocoya
Could you please send me some documentation about the addr:full, because the data of MINEDU considered if the address has not detailed information about the name of street and house number the data is the same as addr:subdistrict, you can see the example below 👇

[govvin]

addr:full is not necessary if you can break them down into their individual components, like you've been doing.

Where street-level information is not available, you may use addr:place=*, if that's necessary. This looks like an appropriate key for populated centers.

[dannykath]

This is great!! @govvin thanks !! I will change the documentation about this ☝️