You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When the nucleus has a long lived isomer there might be issues using the average gamma-ray multiplicity to estimate the population cross section. In these cases the single particle spectra could be more appropriate to use. I cannot see if this has been implemented yet, but I guess it's fairly easy as one could bypass the multiplicity estimation and use a Vector with the SP excitation spectra.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It has not been implemented yet, but I agree that the singles normalization can be performed the way you suggest!
I haven't thought about it very thoroughly, but here's a remak also from the thesis of Ann-Cecilie Larsen (2008, UiO)
Isn't this somewhat contrasting you idea of when to use the average from gammas vs the SP spectra?
Huh, seems like I might have my logic all mixed up😅
Anyways, could be good to keep the issue open since the feature probably should be implemented at some point :)
When the nucleus has a long lived isomer there might be issues using the average gamma-ray multiplicity to estimate the population cross section. In these cases the single particle spectra could be more appropriate to use. I cannot see if this has been implemented yet, but I guess it's fairly easy as one could bypass the multiplicity estimation and use a
Vector
with the SP excitation spectra.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: