You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now to use this we copy & past the oscar.yml file from here to each of our repositories and edit it as needed. Drawback is that tweaking anything in there now required updating several repositories. It can also be easy to miss difference between the different copies. And someone trying to understand the oscar.yml has a lot on their plate.
We could create a GitHub Action (or multiple) to factor out some or even all of the duplicate code. E.g. right now, I think this sequence is repeated twice in our actions:
Writing a simply GitHub Action (which basically acts like a "macro" that contains normal GH Actions YML, with a few parameters), is actually relatively simple. We did it for GAP, see e.g. here: https://github.com/gap-actions/setup-gap-for-packages -- the only thing that really matters there is the action.yml which is mostly self-explanatory, I think. Of course adding a README, LICENSE, tests for the action we nice but not required. Nor is it required to put this into the marketplace.
Anyway, this is not urgent, I simply wanted to record this thought.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now to use this we copy & past the
oscar.yml
file from here to each of our repositories and edit it as needed. Drawback is that tweaking anything in there now required updating several repositories. It can also be easy to miss difference between the different copies. And someone trying to understand theoscar.yml
has a lot on their plate.We could create a GitHub Action (or multiple) to factor out some or even all of the duplicate code. E.g. right now, I think this sequence is repeated twice in our actions:
Well, this could be put into an action
oscar-system/install-devtools
and then can be replaced by something like this:Writing a simply GitHub Action (which basically acts like a "macro" that contains normal GH Actions YML, with a few parameters), is actually relatively simple. We did it for GAP, see e.g. here: https://github.com/gap-actions/setup-gap-for-packages -- the only thing that really matters there is the
action.yml
which is mostly self-explanatory, I think. Of course adding a README, LICENSE, tests for the action we nice but not required. Nor is it required to put this into the marketplace.Anyway, this is not urgent, I simply wanted to record this thought.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: