Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

github.com/compliance-trestle estate #51

Open
butler54 opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

github.com/compliance-trestle estate #51

butler54 opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
task This may be accomplish through a non-PR action or outside of the repo

Comments

@butler54
Copy link
Contributor

Early on in the project I grabbed github.com/compliance-trestle to minimise risk of conflicting / confusing projects.

Currently the org is used to host compliance-trestle.github.io that redirects to the former home of compliance-trestle: https://github.com/ibm/compliance-trestle.

Given that compliance-trestle is the largest project on this org I recommend the followowing:

  1. Repoint from https://github.com/ibm/compliance-trestle to https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle.
  2. Transfer ownership to the either the maintainers of the oscal-compass or or the oscal-compass/community project.
  3. Update the community org to reflect the governance requirements.

Alternatives:

  • I delete organisation completely with the associated risk of squatting
  • I retain ownership (which I think is not the best practice medium term).
@jpower432
Copy link
Member

Hi @butler54 - I agree with your recommendation. Thanks for submitting this issue. I will allow the other reviewers to weigh in to see if there are differing perspectives.

@jflowers
Copy link
Member

Hi @butler54 I too agree. We have it on the agenda for our next oversight committee meeting.

@butler54
Copy link
Contributor Author

butler54 commented Aug 5, 2024

Okay i'll add the redirect now, however, if we could get some comms out on who should be org-owners it would be appreciated.

@butler54
Copy link
Contributor Author

butler54 commented Aug 5, 2024

@jpower432
Copy link
Member

@butler54 We were not able to cover this in the last committee meeting, but I think org owners could probably mirror the org admins here. Do you agree @mrgadgil @jflowers @vikas-agarwal76? I think it may be worth checking with the folks at CNCF to see if the organization would need to be added to the Enterprise Account.

@jpower432 jpower432 added the task This may be accomplish through a non-PR action or outside of the repo label Aug 20, 2024
@butler54
Copy link
Contributor Author

butler54 commented Dec 5, 2024

i can add people, however, it might make sense just to trigger the migration to the CNCF

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
task This may be accomplish through a non-PR action or outside of the repo
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants