-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
subtle or subtle-ng? #176
Comments
At the end of the day, all we know about the situation is that founder A claims the he removed maintainer B from his project due to Code of Conduct violations, maintainer B claims that he and other maintainers were removed for reasons that remain undisclosed, and we as outsiders don’t really have a way of verifying any of that. The lack of transparency from the dalek founder is a little concerning. I would have preferred to know exactly which part of the Code of Conduct was violated. It would also be helpful to hear from the other maintainers on the issue. They may be able to clear some things up. But what it really comes down to is whether But if |
I added some clarification here. Hope that helps. |
It definitely helps @cathieyun! Thanks again for clarifying/confirming. |
I wrote @hdevalence a bit back, about expected support for I'll keep the issue open in case there are other developments, like |
See issues regarding the dalek-cryptography organization:
I'm not sure I'm comfortable continuing to rely on the
subtle
crate. The above seem to be somewhat opposing statements of what has happened, though I still feel weird about the removal of crate owners, even if "warranted" by the maintainer of the org. IMHO, the thing should have happened with more transparency to begin with (like they should've made an announcement).Currently, I'm leaning towards switching to
subtle-ng
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: