License / Permissions confusion #708
boringcrypto
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Reading the discussions here I got this far:
One confusing request is the "no generation services". Does this mean I can't use Google Colab? I can't use it on Stable Horde? What about a hosted Automatic1111 server like RunDiffusion? What about an AWS server on which I install Automatic1111?
Our product allows our users to use any Civitai model by providing the URL and will soon also allow any URL, such as from huggingface or anywhere else. I see this as similar to using Google Colab (which is also a freemium service, just more cumbersome). We provide credit on each image generated using the name of the model and a link back to the Civitai model page.
Overall it feels like a mess right now. Personally I'd say the easiest way out would be to say that all models on Civitai need to be CreativeML Open RAIL-M. If you want to tweak licensing, don't put it on Civitai.
Or Civitai could add an actual list of licenses that are CreativeML Open RAIL-M compatible that creators can choose from and don't allow the license to change for a version once it's published (or only changed to a more relaxed license). It should be very clear to the user if a model isn't licensed with the standard licensing and maybe even a confirmation before downloading, because I bet that most users have never even noticed the requests as they are added now (I didn't until I really started looking into it).
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions