You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When considering implementing a hybrid blockchain it is critical to devise an elegant response matrix for controlling the system and its functionality. Given the harmonic runtime previously proposed, we confidently assume that all nodes participating in the network can assume one of three (LPR) transformations. By adhering to some set of the transformations, each node can preserve the I/O while acting accordingly. These systems act similar to zeno machines hypothesized by researchers exploring advanced turing machines.
App -> Portal ->
F(ac): Actor -> Actor'
G(a, T): { F(a) -> A': if T is offloaded }
H(a): Actor' - (public) -> Reaction
Consensus Mechanisms
The network relies upon the juxtaposition of proof-of-stake and proof-of-work philosophies to produce an optimized, dynamic multi-resource blockchain network. Following the recently formalized Minotaur protocol enables us to confidently explore the implementation of a hybrid network providing perhaps a more concrete validation regarding the motivation to explore such a system. While proof-of-stake has come a long way, it is by no means perfect and implementing a companion proof-of-work consensus protocol consequently optimizes both.
One primary benefit of implementing such a system is the increased opportunity for network participation, allowing both staking and mining operations to coexist. Additionally, as seen in a recent post (linked below), the prolonged dip in bitcoins price has drastically affected its participants while each new block being mined makes it that much more difficult to do so. This is something deeply considered in the formalized protocol as they experimentally verify the stability of a hybrid mechanism when contrasted against pow only blockchains such as Bitcoin.
Engine
Proof of Stake
For our proof-of-stake half of the consensus engine, we have chosen to implement a variant of the Ouroboros Praos protocol.
Proof of Useful Work (PoUW)
The other half of the hybrid network is composed of nodes operating under proof-of-work circumstances, which formally implement the Ofelimos protocol. Ofelimos specifically outlines a proof-of-useful-work optimization on the original pow mechanism powering Bitcoin. Researchers at IOHK were able to formalize a provably secure blockchain protocol describing the motivation, security, and practicality of the specification while proposing several combinatorial optimizations naturally coming about as a result its inherent construction.
discussionideaAny suggestion, feature, proposal, or otherwise
1 participant
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Abstract
When considering implementing a hybrid blockchain it is critical to devise an elegant response matrix for controlling the system and its functionality. Given the harmonic runtime previously proposed, we confidently assume that all nodes participating in the network can assume one of three (LPR) transformations. By adhering to some set of the transformations, each node can preserve the I/O while acting accordingly. These systems act similar to zeno machines hypothesized by researchers exploring advanced turing machines.
App -> Portal ->
F(ac): Actor -> Actor'
G(a, T): { F(a) -> A': if T is offloaded }
H(a): Actor' - (public) -> Reaction
Consensus Mechanisms
The network relies upon the juxtaposition of proof-of-stake and proof-of-work philosophies to produce an optimized, dynamic multi-resource blockchain network. Following the recently formalized Minotaur protocol enables us to confidently explore the implementation of a hybrid network providing perhaps a more concrete validation regarding the motivation to explore such a system. While proof-of-stake has come a long way, it is by no means perfect and implementing a companion proof-of-work consensus protocol consequently optimizes both.
One primary benefit of implementing such a system is the increased opportunity for network participation, allowing both staking and mining operations to coexist. Additionally, as seen in a recent post (linked below), the prolonged dip in bitcoins price has drastically affected its participants while each new block being mined makes it that much more difficult to do so. This is something deeply considered in the formalized protocol as they experimentally verify the stability of a hybrid mechanism when contrasted against pow only blockchains such as Bitcoin.
Engine
Proof of Stake
For our proof-of-stake half of the consensus engine, we have chosen to implement a variant of the Ouroboros Praos protocol.
Proof of Useful Work (PoUW)
The other half of the hybrid network is composed of nodes operating under proof-of-work circumstances, which formally implement the Ofelimos protocol. Ofelimos specifically outlines a proof-of-useful-work optimization on the original pow mechanism powering Bitcoin. Researchers at IOHK were able to formalize a provably secure blockchain protocol describing the motivation, security, and practicality of the specification while proposing several combinatorial optimizations naturally coming about as a result its inherent construction.
References
Links
Protocols
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions