-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Can't extract release tarball #54
Comments
Hmm strange, does As a side note, I attempted to package scientifica and curie for void linux a couple years ago, and it got promptly rejected because it did not meet the "standards" required by a package. |
It unfortunately does not, for neither the 2.2 nor 2.3 tarball.
This was for personal use. (to keep a clean build environment and to auto-remove all files in case I decided to uninstall) On another note, how are you building the tarballs? |
I am using
Are you looking to build ttfs/otbs from source? Or just download them directly from the releases? In the first case, could you maybe download and unpack the tagged tarball? Currently releases are zipped manually by me, I run |
I had a similar issue trying to extract
I don't have GNU Unrelated: with respect to:
Really great font by the way! Not many monospaced bitmap fonts with italics out there it seems. |
I downloaded the v2.2 tarball, to try manually building it before using it in an xbps-src template. (it's akin to a PKGBUILD for pacman)
No matter what flags I pass to
tar
, it returns some variant of "tar: This does not look like a tar archive".scientifica.tar works fine, but as xbps would install it to /usr/share/fonts, I'd like to build it myself. (per xbps conventions for building font packages)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: