Replies: 4 comments
-
ZFS Version: 2.1.15 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
question: there is no such problem for some other pool |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
First, as I see the pool is not reported as dRAID, the message is merely meaning that if you use dRAID, then you may think about reducing the number of data disks per group. Second, RAIDZ2 is indeed very inefficient for storing small objects, especially of disks with 4KB physical sector size. To store up to 4KB of data RAIDZ2 would need 12KB of space, to store up to 16KB of data it would need 24KB of space, to store up to 28KB of data -- 36KB of space, etc. You are creating ZVOL in which every block will have size of no more than 8KB, which means you will likely use 2x more space than required and have pretty low sequential performance. So either increase the block size, or, if you really don't want for some very good reason, use mirror (tripple mirror if your really need that redundancy). There is no bug here. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
environment
pool
disk detail:
rdfs is a alias name
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions