Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better documentation for font-face #200

Open
wbamberg opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Better documentation for font-face #200

wbamberg opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
proposal (actionable) Enough information is provided and the work is scoped well. Actionable but not prioritized right now

Comments

@wbamberg
Copy link
Member

Problem statement

This came out of mdn/content#32619, which I think happened because we don't document @font-face descriptors and their relation to the corresponding properties very well. I filed mdn/content#32853 which I think is probably an improvement but in the course of looking into that I thought there are bigger problems in our documentation of @font-face, and probably other aspects of fonts in CSS.

  • there's no guide to using @font-face
  • we use technical terms that are widely misunderstood, but don't define them
  • the pages on @font-face descriptors don't do a good job of explaining them or how they relate to the corresponding properties.

Proposed solutions

This includes:

  • we should have glossary entries for various terms, like "font", "font face", "font family", "typeface"
  • we should have a thorough guide on @font-face. Currently we have a bit on this in Learn (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/CSS/Styling_text/Web_fonts) but it's very basic.
  • we should check through all the pages on @font-face descriptors to ensure they make sense.

Task list

  • [ ]

Priority assessment

  • Effort: medium
  • Dependencies: none - except, good examples here mean we need to include sample fonts in the repo, which are big. A technical solution (like a separate example-fonts repo that we can refer to from live samples) might be good.
  • Community enablement: n/a
  • Momentum: n/a
  • Enabling learners: yes
  • Enabling professionals: yes
  • Underrepresented topics / Ethical web: n/a
  • Operational necessities: n/a
  • Addressing needs of the web industry: yes

More information

Open Web Docs (OWD) is a non-profit collective funded by corporate and individual donations.

In order for this project to happen, please consider donating to OWD at https://opencollective.com/open-web-docs.
For more information on sponsorship and membership tiers, see https://openwebdocs.org/membership/

More information is available at https://openwebdocs.org/.
For questions, please reach out to [email protected].

@Elchi3 Elchi3 added proposal (actionable) Enough information is provided and the work is scoped well. Actionable but not prioritized right now and removed not ready labels May 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
proposal (actionable) Enough information is provided and the work is scoped well. Actionable but not prioritized right now
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants