Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Map downloading still required when imported .OSM #216

Open
duffskit opened this issue Apr 22, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Map downloading still required when imported .OSM #216

duffskit opened this issue Apr 22, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@duffskit
Copy link

Hi,

On 0.18.2, I've imported a (large) .OSM file, but I keep getting messages that the area I'm editing is outside the download area.

Is it normal to have to keep downloading sections of the map in real time even when you have the OSM file that covers the area?

Thanks,

@Krakonos
Copy link
Member

Hi!
From the top of my head, Merkaartor does not consider OSM file as "authoritative", as it can be arbitrarily old. One way would be to download the section and then save the Merkaartor project, not the OSM file itself. That should store the information.

That might be a problem if the area is too large, as Merkaartor currently cannot split it into multiple pieces. Is this the problem you're trying to solve, or saving the project would work for you?

Anyway, I think it might be useful to make an option when importing OSM file to consider it authoritative, or perhaps to have a "Don't bother me again" button when you first edit it? I think the second one would be much easier, as I'm not sure how this data is managed and how to extract that from the OSM file itself (I haven't written that part of the code...).

@duffskit
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the quick response! Yes it's quite a large map, so lots of downloading sections needed. I'll give that a go for now and save, but an option to treat the OSM as authoritative would be quite handy :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants