Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove mapping type support #6

Closed
dreamer-89 opened this issue Feb 21, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Remove mapping type support #6

dreamer-89 opened this issue Feb 21, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@dreamer-89
Copy link
Member

dreamer-89 commented Feb 21, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Is your feature request related to a problem?
As part of v2.0 release, mapping type are removed from OpenSearch engine. Need to remove the support of type from clients
Issue 1940

What solution would you like?
Upgrade the client code to remove usage of

  • Type API end-points
  • Remove include_type_name parameter from API requests.

Top level changes are captured in gist below:
https://gist.github.com/dreamer-89/d76eaf639171e8ab32fa7f8b9d6c93d3

For more detailed changes, please check meta issue below:
Related: OpenSearch-engine meta issue
@dreamer-89 dreamer-89 added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 21, 2022
@dreamer-89 dreamer-89 mentioned this issue Feb 21, 2022
Closed
@dreamer-89 dreamer-89 changed the title [Upgrade]: Remove type mapping support Remove mapping type support Mar 3, 2022
@dreamer-89
Copy link
Member Author

This change goes in v2.0.0 release in OpenSearch repository and is a breaking change. Request maintainer to add appropriate labels.

@dreamer-89 dreamer-89 mentioned this issue Mar 10, 2022
Closed
67 tasks
@VachaShah
Copy link
Collaborator

Added as part of meta issue #12

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@VachaShah @dreamer-89