Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Big-ANN Ground truth data as param in vector search #530

Closed
VijayanB opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Support Big-ANN Ground truth data as param in vector search #530

VijayanB opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@VijayanB
Copy link
Member

VijayanB commented May 1, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

BIGANN is one of the popular vector search dataset to measure the performance. However, they follow different format for Base data, Query data and Ground truth. Currently, Vector Search Neighbor param doesn't support Ground truth format. This is different from base data, hence, BigANNVectorDataSet should extend support to read, parse, convert it into neighbors like hdf5 for "bin" extension.

Describe the solution you'd like

Extend BigANN Dataset to support new extension "bin" that can parse ground truth and can be used as input for neighbors data set .

Describe alternatives you've considered

Manually convert it into hdf5 or previously supported format like fbin/u8bin

Additional context

N/A

@VijayanB VijayanB added the enhancement New feature or request label May 1, 2024
@VijayanB
Copy link
Member Author

VijayanB commented May 1, 2024

This was previously supported only in perf-tool . It was not added in osb since recall was not supported. With recall support, adding this format, will help users to gradually move out of perf-tool and use OSB for all use cases.

@VijayanB
Copy link
Member Author

VijayanB commented May 1, 2024

Can we add 1.6 release tag to this issue? Thank you.

@IanHoang
Copy link
Collaborator

IanHoang commented Dec 3, 2024

@VijayanB This seems to be merged in already? Closing issue. Reopen if needed

@IanHoang IanHoang closed this as completed Dec 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants