Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[DOC] Incorrect parameter name for Split ingest processor #7754

Closed
1 of 4 tasks
dbwiddis opened this issue Jul 17, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7767
Closed
1 of 4 tasks

[DOC] Incorrect parameter name for Split ingest processor #7754

dbwiddis opened this issue Jul 17, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7767
Assignees
@dbwiddis
Labels
2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress.

Comments

@dbwiddis
Copy link
Member

dbwiddis commented Jul 17, 2024 •
edited
Loading

What do you want to do?

  • Request a change to existing documentation
  • Add new documentation
  • Report a technical problem with the documentation
  • Other

Tell us about your request.

The documentation for the ingest pipeline split processor incorrectly gives preserve_field as a parameter name, when the actual parameter processed in the code is preserve_trailing.

Version: All

What other resources are available?

Will fix this when addressing #7744
@dbwiddis dbwiddis self-assigned this Jul 17, 2024
@dbwiddis dbwiddis mentioned this issue Jul 17, 2024
Merged
1 task
@dbwiddis dbwiddis added the 3 - Tech review PR: Tech review in progress label Jul 17, 2024
@hdhalter hdhalter added 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. and removed untriaged 3 - Tech review PR: Tech review in progress labels Jul 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dbwiddis dbwiddis

Labels
2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Document new Split and Sort SearchResponseProcessors dbwiddis/documentation-website
2 participants
@dbwiddis @hdhalter