Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add verbose pipeline parameter to output each processor's execution details #16843

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

junweid62
Copy link

@junweid62 junweid62 commented Dec 13, 2024

Description

Related RFC : #16705

This PR introduces enhancements to OpenSearch's search pipeline functionality, focusing on improving the traceability and debugging of search request and response transformations. It addresses the increasing complexity of search pipeline processors by implementing verbose mode support, which provides detailed insights into processor execution.

  1. Adds Verbose Mode for Search Pipelines:

    • Introduced the verbose_pipeline parameter to search requests, default to false.
    • Tracks each processor’s input, output, execution time, and status (success/failure).
    • Provides detailed logs of the data flow through request and response processors.
  2. Improves Pipeline Debugging:

    • Captures step-by-step data transformations applied by each processor.
    • Includes execution metadata (e.g., timestamps and elapsed time) in search responses for better analysis.
  3. Supports All Pipeline Configurations:

    • Works seamlessly with:
      • Default pipelines configured at the index level.
      • Pipelines explicitly specified in the search request.
      • Ad-hoc pipelines defined inline.
  4. Test Framework Enhancements:

    • Added tests for verbose mode to ensure correct functionality and compatibility.

Example output with request processor: filter_query response processor: rename_field and sort

{
    "took": 29,
    "timed_out": false,
    "_shards": {
        "total": 1,
        "successful": 1,
        "skipped": 0,
        "failed": 0
    },
    "hits": {
        "total": {
            "value": 1,
            "relation": "eq"
        },
        "max_score": 0.9116078,
        "hits": [
            {
                "_index": "my_index",
                "_id": "2",
                "_score": 0.9116078,
                "_source": {
                    "notification": "This is a public message 2",
                    "visibility": "public"
                }
            }
        ]
    },
    "processor_result": [
        {
            "processor_name": "filter_query",
            "duration_millis": 0,
            "input_data": {
                "query": {
                    "bool": {
                        "must": [
                            {
                                "match": {
                                    "message": {
                                        "query": "This is a public message 1",
                                        "operator": "OR",
                                        "prefix_length": 0,
                                        "max_expansions": 50,
                                        "fuzzy_transpositions": true,
                                        "lenient": false,
                                        "zero_terms_query": "NONE",
                                        "auto_generate_synonyms_phrase_query": true,
                                        "boost": 1.0
                                    }
                                }
                            }
                        ],
                        "adjust_pure_negative": true,
                        "boost": 1.0
                    }
                },
                "search_pipeline": "my_pipeline"
            },
            "output_data": {
                "query": {
                    "bool": {
                        "must": [
                            {
                                "bool": {
                                    "must": [
                                        {
                                            "match": {
                                                "message": {
                                                    "query": "This is a public message 1",
                                                    "operator": "OR",
                                                    "prefix_length": 0,
                                                    "max_expansions": 50,
                                                    "fuzzy_transpositions": true,
                                                    "lenient": false,
                                                    "zero_terms_query": "NONE",
                                                    "auto_generate_synonyms_phrase_query": true,
                                                    "boost": 1.0
                                                }
                                            }
                                        }
                                    ],
                                    "adjust_pure_negative": true,
                                    "boost": 1.0
                                }
                            }
                        ],
                        "filter": [
                            {
                                "term": {
                                    "visibility": {
                                        "value": "public",
                                        "boost": 1.0
                                    }
                                }
                            }
                        ],
                        "adjust_pure_negative": true,
                        "boost": 1.0
                    }
                },
                "search_pipeline": "my_pipeline"
            }
        },
        {
            "processor_name": "rename_field",
            "duration_millis": 0,
            "input_data": [
                {
                    "_index": "my_index",
                    "_id": "2",
                    "_score": 0.9116078,
                    "_source": {
                        "message": "This is a public message 2",
                        "visibility": "public"
                    }
                }
            ],
            "output_data": [
                {
                    "_index": "my_index",
                    "_id": "2",
                    "_score": 0.9116078,
                    "_source": {
                        "notification": "This is a public message 2",
                        "visibility": "public"
                    }
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "processor_name": "sort",
            "duration_millis": 0,
            "input_data": [
                {
                    "_index": "my_index",
                    "_id": "2",
                    "_score": 0.9116078,
                    "_source": {
                        "notification": "This is a public message 2",
                        "visibility": "public"
                    }
                }
            ],
            "output_data": [
                {
                    "_index": "my_index",
                    "_id": "2",
                    "_score": 0.9116078,
                    "_source": {
                        "notification": "This is a public message 2",
                        "visibility": "public"
                    }
                }
            ]
        }
    ]
}

Related Issues

Resolves #14745

Check List

  • Functionality includes testing.
  • API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Other Priority-High Search Search query, autocomplete ...etc v2.19.0 Issues and PRs related to version 2.19.0 labels Dec 13, 2024
@junweid62 junweid62 added the backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch label Dec 13, 2024
Signed-off-by: Junwei Dai <[email protected]>
@junweid62 junweid62 force-pushed the search-pipline-execution branch from d5a2c4c to d931750 Compare December 13, 2024 00:26
Signed-off-by: Junwei Dai <[email protected]>
@junweid62
Copy link
Author

@joshpalis Hey Josh, can you take a look when you have time? :)

Signed-off-by: Junwei Dai <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 488377f: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 719fa1c: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@junweid62 junweid62 force-pushed the search-pipline-execution branch from 719fa1c to e4e30f5 Compare December 13, 2024 17:41
Copy link
Member

@joshpalis joshpalis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work @junweid62 on implementing this feature. A few comments from my initial pass

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for e4e30f5: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Signed-off-by: Junwei Dai <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

❕ Gradle check result for 615a4b6: UNSTABLE

  • TEST FAILURES:
      2 org.opensearch.cluster.MinimumClusterManagerNodesIT.testThreeNodesNoClusterManagerBlock

Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 42.45810% with 103 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 72.04%. Comparing base (b67cdf4) to head (615a4b6).
Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...arch/search/pipeline/ProcessorExecutionDetail.java 18.44% 84 Missing ⚠️
.../java/org/opensearch/search/pipeline/Pipeline.java 68.18% 6 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...a/org/opensearch/action/search/SearchResponse.java 16.66% 4 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...opensearch/search/builder/SearchSourceBuilder.java 78.57% 0 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...ensearch/action/search/SearchResponseSections.java 77.77% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...pensearch/rest/action/search/RestSearchAction.java 0.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #16843      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     72.03%   72.04%   +0.01%     
- Complexity    65230    65238       +8     
============================================
  Files          5318     5319       +1     
  Lines        304051   304224     +173     
  Branches      43990    44022      +32     
============================================
+ Hits         219021   219187     +166     
- Misses        67121    67134      +13     
+ Partials      17909    17903       -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: Junwei Dai <[email protected]>
@junweid62 junweid62 force-pushed the search-pipline-execution branch from 820849b to 0ae4d06 Compare December 18, 2024 21:59
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 0ae4d06: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@junweid62
Copy link
Author

Hi, @dbwiddis Could you please take a moment to review this PR when you have the time? I’d appreciate any feedback you might have :)

@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/),
- Add new configuration setting `synonym_analyzer`, to the `synonym` and `synonym_graph` filters, enabling the specification of a custom analyzer for reading the synonym file ([#16488](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/16488)).
- Add stats for remote publication failure and move download failure stats to remote methods([#16682](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/16682/))
- Added a precaution to handle extreme date values during sorting to prevent `arithmetic_exception: long overflow` ([#16812](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/16812)).
- Add `verbose_pipeline` parameter to output each processor's execution details ([#14745](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/14745)).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

link has to point to PR #16843, current one is for the issue

@@ -302,6 +305,9 @@ public SearchSourceBuilder(StreamInput in) throws IOException {
if (in.getVersion().onOrAfter(Version.V_2_18_0)) {
searchPipeline = in.readOptionalString();
}
if (in.getVersion().onOrAfter(Version.CURRENT)) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you need to have exact version here, CURRENT will change with every next release

@@ -385,6 +391,9 @@ public void writeTo(StreamOutput out) throws IOException {
if (out.getVersion().onOrAfter(Version.V_2_18_0)) {
out.writeOptionalString(searchPipeline);
}
if (out.getVersion().onOrAfter(Version.CURRENT)) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same as in previous comment

return this;
}

public Boolean verbosePipeline() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why return type is a wrapper around primitive Boolean?


private static void writeProcessorResultOnOrAfter(StreamOutput out, List<ProcessorExecutionDetail> processorResult) throws IOException {
if (out.getVersion().onOrAfter(Version.V_2_18_0)) {
out.writeCollection(processorResult, (o, detail) -> detail.writeTo(o));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 to Josh's comment, please use out.writeList()

@@ -146,11 +147,18 @@ void transformRequest(SearchRequest request, ActionListener<SearchRequest> reque
final ActionListener<SearchRequest> nextListener = currentListener;
SearchRequestProcessor processor = searchRequestProcessors.get(i);
currentListener = ActionListener.wrap(r -> {
ProcessorExecutionDetail detail = new ProcessorExecutionDetail(processor.getType());
detail.addInput(r.source().shallowCopy());
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you add check for verbosePipeline here, we're adding unnecessary overhead of doing shallow copy in case verbose is not enabled

@@ -225,11 +241,19 @@ ActionListener<SearchResponse> transformResponseListener(
final SearchResponseProcessor processor = searchResponseProcessors.get(i);

responseListener = ActionListener.wrap(r -> {
ProcessorExecutionDetail detail = new ProcessorExecutionDetail(processor.getType());
detail.addInput(Arrays.asList(r.getHits().deepCopy().getHits()));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we need to spend cycles on doing shallow copy only in case verbose flag is set, please consider making corresponding changes

attributes.computeIfAbsent(PROCESSOR_EXECUTION_DETAILS_KEY, k -> new ArrayList<ProcessorExecutionDetail>());
List<ProcessorExecutionDetail> details = (List<ProcessorExecutionDetail>) attributes.get(PROCESSOR_EXECUTION_DETAILS_KEY);
details.add(detail);
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Few extra cycles here for accessing map, how about this version:

public void addProcessorExecutionDetail(ProcessorExecutionDetail detail) {
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    List<ProcessorExecutionDetail> details = (List<ProcessorExecutionDetail>) attributes.computeIfAbsent(
        PROCESSOR_EXECUTION_DETAILS_KEY,
        k -> new ArrayList<>()
    );
    details.add(detail);
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Other Priority-High Search Search query, autocomplete ...etc v2.19.0 Issues and PRs related to version 2.19.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature Request] Support a verbose/debugging param in search pipelines
3 participants