Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Remote Store] Mixed mode support for remote store migration #12245

Closed
gbbafna opened this issue Feb 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

[Remote Store] Mixed mode support for remote store migration #12245

gbbafna opened this issue Feb 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
@gbbafna
Labels
enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Storage:Durability Issues and PRs related to the durability framework Storage:Remote

Comments

@gbbafna
Copy link
Collaborator

gbbafna commented Feb 8, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe

To enable migration of document replication clusters to remote store backed clusters, we will need to allow mixed mode clusters .

Describe the solution you'd like

The behavior is going to be as followed

  1. STRICT Mode - Only one type of node (remote or docrep node) is allowed to join cluster.
  2. MIXED Mode - Any type of node (remote or docrep node) is allowed to join cluster. We will also need another DIRECTION setting to dictate which nodes the new index is going to land . MIXED Mode should only be allowed in an experimental flag till we add complete support for same.

Related component

Storage:Remote

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response
@gbbafna gbbafna added enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request untriaged labels Feb 8, 2024
@gbbafna gbbafna added Storage:Durability Issues and PRs related to the durability framework and removed untriaged labels Feb 8, 2024
@gbbafna gbbafna self-assigned this Feb 8, 2024
@gbbafna gbbafna mentioned this issue Feb 8, 2024
Closed
@gbbafna gbbafna moved this from 🆕 New to ✅ Done in Storage Project Board Mar 4, 2024
@gbbafna
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gbbafna commented Mar 4, 2024

Changes merged to main, 2.x backport is in progress.

@gbbafna gbbafna moved this from ✅ Done to 🏗 In progress in Storage Project Board Mar 4, 2024
This was referenced Mar 18, 2024
Closed
Merged
@gbbafna
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gbbafna commented Mar 19, 2024

Backported to 2.x

@gbbafna gbbafna closed this as completed Mar 19, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🏗 In progress to ✅ Done in Storage Project Board Mar 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@gbbafna gbbafna

Labels
enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Storage:Durability Issues and PRs related to the durability framework Storage:Remote
Projects
Storage Project Board
Status: ✅ Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Bukhtawar @gbbafna