Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Supporting fast bucket aggregation on numeric multi field aggregation #11740

Open
jainankitk opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Search:Performance

Comments

@jainankitk
Copy link
Collaborator

jainankitk commented Jan 4, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe

#9310 introduces approach for improving the date histogram aggregation without any sub aggregation. We can leverage similar approach to introduce new mapping type for storing multiple single dimensional as single multi dimensional field. It can then be used for optimizing bucket aggregation involving those fields.

If this is feasible, this should allow customers to significantly optimize latency of their common use case for slight indexing and storage overhead.

If this is feasible, this should allow customers to significantly optimize latency of their common use case for slight indexing and storage overhead.

Related component

Search:Performance

@jainankitk jainankitk added enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request untriaged labels Jan 4, 2024
@getsaurabh02 getsaurabh02 moved this from Todo to Now (This Quarter) in Performance Roadmap Jan 5, 2024
@peternied
Copy link
Member

[Triage - attendees 1 2]
@jainankitk Thanks for filing this issue

@bowenlan-amzn bowenlan-amzn moved this from Now (This Quarter) to In Progress in Performance Roadmap Feb 26, 2024
@bowenlan-amzn bowenlan-amzn moved this from In Progress to Todo in Performance Roadmap Apr 1, 2024
@bowenlan-amzn bowenlan-amzn moved this from Todo to untriaged in Performance Roadmap May 3, 2024
@bowenlan-amzn bowenlan-amzn removed their assignment Jun 18, 2024
@bowenlan-amzn
Copy link
Member

We may research on this idea after supporting the sub aggregation #12602
Both targets are this operation from big5 workload

https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-benchmark-workloads/blob/7c5ddaab4cba352d3a220d1ac7d571830b54fd57/big5/operations/default.json#L535-L581

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Search:Performance
Projects
Status: Untriaged
Status: 🆕 New
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants