Enable doc_values based searching across different field types

[harshavamsi]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
While working on #11097 i realized that MultiTerm queries over Boolean fields in OpenSearch don't support doc_values. I also noticed that the documentation is incorrect and that booleans have doc_values enabled by default.

This is prevalent across multiple field types, there is a fix going out in #11144 to fix this for IP fields, I would also like to do this for other fields:

• Date field -- https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/blob/main/server/src/main/java/org/opensearch/index/mapper/DateFieldMapper.java#L467
• Geo Point - https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/blob/10d34beb85ebee0a6bf36afece16e4ed991de641/server/src/main/java/org/opensearch/index/mapper/GeoPointFieldMapper.java#L239C9-L239C9
• Geo Shape -

  OpenSearch/server/src/main/java/org/opensearch/index/query/VectorGeoShapeQueryProcessor.java

  Line 84 in 10d34be

  return LatLonShape.newGeometryQuery(fieldName, relation.getLuceneRelation(), geometries.toArray(new LatLonGeometry[0]));

Describe the solution you'd like
Since boolean fields type extends TermBasedFieldType we should probably override the termQuery and termsQuery functions and add support for doc_values queries. While we're at it, we should also add IndexOrDocValuesQuery to the range query. This will help use-cases where we have a range on a boolean field matching a lot of values.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Alternative is to do nothing. This is obviously bad since users will miss out on doc_values based queries that can improve performance.

Additional context
N/A

[kiranprakash154]

Hi, are we on track for this to be released in 2.12 ?

[msfroh]

Note that for Boolean fields, we might not see much benefit from a performance standpoint for indexed fields (since we have an efficient advance implementation for term queries and multiterm query expansion isn't going to expand beyond two terms).

That said, for consistency, now that we're supporting DV-only queries on many field types (including keyword, where Boolean is essentially a very restricted subcase of a keyword field), I like the idea that any field with doc values can support a (maybe slow) DV-only query.