Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvement: PHC string handling & verify fn #3

Open
malobre opened this issue Nov 13, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Improvement: PHC string handling & verify fn #3

malobre opened this issue Nov 13, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@malobre
Copy link

malobre commented Nov 13, 2023

A nice DX improvement would be to provide verify and hash functions that handles PHC strings.

Here's a wrapper I currently use which only depends on the rfc4648 package for base64 (by far the best implementation I could find) :

PHC string handlers
// This is free and unencumbered software released into the public domain.
// 
// Anyone is free to copy, modify, publish, use, compile, sell, or
// distribute this software, either in source code form or as a compiled
// binary, for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial, and by any
// means.
// 
// In jurisdictions that recognize copyright laws, the author or authors
// of this software dedicate any and all copyright interest in the
// software to the public domain. We make this dedication for the benefit
// of the public at large and to the detriment of our heirs and
// successors. We intend this dedication to be an overt act of
// relinquishment in perpetuity of all present and future rights to this
// software under copyright law.
// 
// THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
// EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
// MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
// IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR
// OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE,
// ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
// OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
// 
// For more information, please refer to <https://unlicense.org>

import { base64 } from "rfc4648";

import loadArgon2idWasm, { Argon2idParams } from "argon2id";

const argon2id = await loadArgon2idWasm();

export const hash = (params: Argon2idParams) => {
  const digest = argon2id(params);

  return "$".concat(
    [
      "argon2id",
      `v=${0x13}`,
      [
        `m=${params.memorySize}`,
        `t=${params.passes}`,
        `p=${params.parallelism}`,
      ].join(","),
      base64.stringify(params.salt, { pad: false }),
      base64.stringify(digest, { pad: false }),
    ].join("$"),
  );
};

// NOT CONSTANT-TIME !
export const verify = (
  password: Uint8Array,
  phcString: string,
  secret?: Uint8Array,
) => {
  const [id, version, paramsString, saltB64, digestB64] = phcString
    .substring(1)
    .split("$", 5);

  if (id !== "argon2id") throw `unknown hashing function: ${id}`;
  if (version !== `v=${0x13}`) throw `unknown argon2id version: ${version}`;

  const params = Object.fromEntries(
    paramsString.split(",").map((param) => param.split("=", 2)),
  );

  if (!("m" in params)) throw "missing `m` parameter";
  if (!("t" in params)) throw "missing `t` parameter";
  if (!("p" in params)) throw "missing `p` parameter";

  const memorySize = Number.parseInt(params.m);
  const passes = Number.parseInt(params.t);
  const parallelism = Number.parseInt(params.p);
  const ad =
    "data" in params ? base64.parse(params.data, { loose: true }) : undefined;

  const salt = base64.parse(saltB64, { loose: true });
  const digest = base64.parse(digestB64, { loose: true });

  const expectedDigest = argon2id({
    password,
    salt,
    secret,
    ad,
    memorySize,
    passes,
    parallelism,
    tagLength: digest.length,
  });

  for (let i = 0; i < digest.length; i++) {
    if (digest[i] !== expectedDigest[i]) return false;
  }

  return true;
};

export default {
  hash,
  verify,
};

By the way, thank you for this high quality package :)

@malobre malobre changed the title Feature Request: PHC string handling & verify fn Improvement: PHC string handling & verify fn Nov 13, 2023
@mitar
Copy link

mitar commented Jan 25, 2024

Yes, PHC would be great to have to have interoperability with server-side code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants