[PRE REVIEW]: CurvilinearGrids.jl: A Julia package for curvilinear coordinate transformations

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @smillerc (Samuel Miller)
Repository: https://github.com/smillerc/CurvilinearGrids.jl
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper
Version: v0.6.5
Editor: @jbytecode
Reviewers: @hemanthgrylls, @DanielVandH
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/100d36450dcddc770815124e4c8165b3"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/100d36450dcddc770815124e4c8165b3/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/100d36450dcddc770815124e4c8165b3/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/100d36450dcddc770815124e4c8165b3)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @smillerc. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@smillerc if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.2514/3.61273 is OK
- 10.1006/jcph.2002.7117 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.105859 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compfluid.2022.105706 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112654 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- None

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.04 s (995.7 files/s, 143141.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia                           33            939            990           3603
Markdown                         2             51              0            189
YAML                             4              1              8            131
TeX                              1              4              0             74
TOML                             2              4              0             44
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            42            999            998           4041
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    91	Sam Miller
    84	Miller, Samuel
    17	CompatHelper Julia

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 970

🔴 Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

GridapDistributed: a massively parallel finite element toolbox in Julia
Submitting author: @amartinhuertas
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @PetrKryslUCSD, @Leticia-maria, @jedbrown
Similarity score: 0.7629

LaplaceInterpolation.jl: A Julia package for fast interpolation on a grid
Submitting author: @lootie
Handling editor: @VivianePons (Retired)
Reviewers: @wkearn, @eviatarbach
Similarity score: 0.7531

SpeedyWeather.jl: Reinventing atmospheric general circulation models towards interactivity and extensibility
Submitting author: @milankl
Handling editor: @kthyng (Active)
Reviewers: @vavrines, @natgeo-wong, @slayoo
Similarity score: 0.7495

IndividualDisplacements.jl: a Julia package to simulate and study particle displacements within the climate system
Submitting author: @gaelforget
Handling editor: @kthyng (Active)
Reviewers: @milankl, @visr
Similarity score: 0.7471

OpenGeoSysUncertaintyQuantification.jl: a Julia library implementing an uncertainty quantification toolbox for OpenGeoSys
Submitting author: @baxmittens
Handling editor: @kanishkan91 (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @dannys4
Similarity score: 0.7422

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[danielskatz]

@smillerc - thanks for your submission. As track editor, I'll next look for an editor for your work.

[danielskatz]

👋 @jbytecode - I know you are already over your limit, so you likely don't have the ability to edit this one, but I wanted to check with you rather than assuming...

[jbytecode]

@danielskatz - Sure, gladly! I enjoy editing Julia submissions.

[jbytecode]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @jbytecode is now the editor

[jbytecode]

@smillerc - Hi, I am the handling editor of this submission. Thank you for sending your work to JOSS.

I will try to find at least 2 suitable reviewers. The editorialbot reports an AI based recommendation of similar papers in here

#7494 (comment)

We can select the authors of those similar submissions as reviewers. Another source is the list of potential reviewers.

First, I will try inviting the reviewers you suggest, if any. Otherwise, I will search them myself.

Please if you have suggestions, provide me a list with their GitHub handles and please don't use @ character to avoid any bothering notifications.

Thank you in advance!

[smillerc]

@jbytecode Thank you for taking on the editor role! I don't really have a good idea on who to recommend, other than perhaps hemanthgrylls. I cite his work in the manuscript, so he will be familiar with the type of problem I'm solving with the software.

[jbytecode]

👋👋👋 Dear @hemanthgrylls, @DanielVandH 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:

CurvilinearGrids.jl: A Julia package for curvilinear coordinate transformations

You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (#7494).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be 23 check items for each single reviewer.

Thank you in advance!

[hemanthgrylls]

Hi @jbytecode
I am happy to review the repository. Thanks.

[jbytecode]

@editorialbot add @hemanthgrylls as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@hemanthgrylls added to the reviewers list!

[DanielVandH]

Hi @jbytecode, sure I'm happy to.

[jbytecode]

@editorialbot add @DanielVandH as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@DanielVandH added to the reviewers list!

[jbytecode]

@hemanthgrylls, @DanielVandH - Thank you for your super fast feed-back. Now we have at least 2 reviewers.

I am starting the review in a separate thread, see you there!

[jbytecode]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #7508.