You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I also come to the conclusion that the namespace used in the schemas at schemas.opengis.org are wrong.
However, this question should be answered the SWG (CC @pebau). Thus, I propose to contact the SWG directly.
indeed, quite confusing - not only for you. By way of history, when these specs were written coverages happened to be the first users of a ModSpec in beta (at best) - see how ModSpec discussion is still going on today.
I always had asked for a recipe "OGC URLs for dummies", so suitable for me. We should look at that as the ground truth for inspection, verification, and - should it be necessary - fixing.
@dstenger, @ghobona : can you point us to the authoritative OGC URL reference? Based on that, I am available for getting hands URL-dirty.
Some extensions declare different namespaces in the PDF specification (followed by CITE tests) and in the published schemas.
For example, interpolation:
In the specification, page 3, Table 2, the "int" prefix is bound to http://www.opengis.net/wcs/interpolation/1.0
https://schemas.opengis.net/wcs/interpolation/1.0/wcsInt.xsd declares
xmlns:int="http://www.opengis.net/WCS_service-extension_interpolation/1.0
https://schemas.opengis.net/wcs/interpolation/1.1/wcsInt.xsd declares:
xmlns:int="http://www.opengis.net/WCS_service-extension_interpolation/1.1
The test for interpolation in this repository declares
xmlns:int="http://www.opengis.net/wcs/interpolation/1.0"
.I'm going to guess the schemas at schemas.opengis.org are wrong... could you confirm?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: