Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-modelled GML concepts should be mentioned in the specification #50

Open
TatjanaKutzner opened this issue Apr 15, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@TatjanaKutzner
Copy link
Contributor

In the CityGML 3.0 Conceptual Model, dependency from GML has been overcome by defining the GML concepts in a language-independent way in the Conceptual Model itself. See issues
opengeospatial/CityGML-3.0CM/issues/16 and opengeospatial/CityGML-3.0CM/issues/18

When mapping the Conceptual Model to GML application schemas, the concepts that have been defined language-independently are not encoded, but are mapped to the existing GML concepts.
It might be useful to explicitly describe these concepts in the GML Encoding Standard and to which GML concept they are mapped.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant