feat: upgrade mathjax from v2 to v3

[navinkarkera]

See openedx/edx-platform#33555 for details.

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @navinkarkera! Please note that it may take us up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Feel free to add as much of the following information to the ticket as you can:

• supporting documentation
• Open edX discussion forum threads
• timeline information ("this must be merged by XX date", and why that is)
• partner information ("this is a course on edx.org")
• any other information that can help Product understand the context for the PR

All technical communication about the code itself will be done via the GitHub pull request interface. As a reminder, our process documentation is here.

Please let us know once your PR is ready for our review and all tests are green.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (88e1234) 52.41% compared to head (c1b485a) 52.41%.
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #352   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   52.41%   52.41%           
=======================================
  Files          75       75           
  Lines        1986     1986           
  Branches      359      359           
=======================================
  Hits         1041     1041           
  Misses        912      912           
  Partials       33       33           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[itsjeyd]

Hey @navinkarkera, is this PR ready for review?

[navinkarkera]

@itsjeyd Yes.

[itsjeyd]

@jristau1984 This PR is ready for engineering review by TNL.

[tecoholic]

@navinkarkera Kindly add "jira:2U" label to this, if you have access.

cc: @itsjeyd just in case Navin didn't have the access on this repo.

[openedx-webhooks]

I've created issue TNL-11195 in the private 2U Jira.

[itsjeyd]

Hey @jristau1984, do you have any updates about when we can expect TNL to review this PR?

[jristau1984]

@itsjeyd, @wittjeff has offered feedback that the impact of this change needs to be handled in a much more conservative way than just upgrading. Due to that, it has caused this PR to stall.

[itsjeyd]

@jristau1984 Thanks for the update.

... this change needs to be handled in a much more conservative way than just upgrading.

To understand better, is that work happening via another PR? Or would @navinkarkera be expected to address @wittjeff's concerns in the context of this PR (and if so where can he find the feedback)?

[navinkarkera]

if so where can he find the feedback?

@itsjeyd We have feedback from Jeff in edx-platform PR: openedx/edx-platform#33555

[itsjeyd]

@navinkarkera OK I see. I'll keep this PR in the Blocked status, then. Let me know when you're ready to resume the work here.

CC @jristau1984

[itsjeyd]

Hey @navinkarkera, do you have any updates on when this PR might get unblocked?

[itsjeyd]

@navinkarkera Friendly ping about my comment above.

[navinkarkera]

@itsjeyd Apologies for missing your ping. This is blocked on openedx/edx-platform#33555 and we don't have a go ahead from 2U yet. Once course outline MFE project is completed, we might be able to get this across if 2U agrees.

[itsjeyd]

@navinkarkera Sounds good, thanks for the update!

[bradenmacdonald]

Hey folks, we are planning to deprecate frontend-app-library-authoring and roll all related library authoring functionality into frontend-app-course-authoring. I also don't want any mathjax-related code to appear in the MFEs at all. Each individual XBlock that uses MathJax should provide its own MathJax environment. So I believe this PR can be closed.

[navinkarkera]

@bradenmacdonald Makes sense, I'll close the PR.

[openedx-webhooks]

@navinkarkera Even though your pull request wasn’t merged, please take a moment to answer a two question survey so we can improve your experience in the future.