You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I had some issues (unrealistic erosion) with using the standard nautical wind file when doing some 1D simulations in Aeolis V3. It should be documented that the wind file for 1D is different than for 2D. In 2D simulations we can use the nautical wind direction with the use of alfa to correct for coastal orientation. In 1D simulations it is better to use the cartesian wind direction by transforming the nautical wind input to cross-shore components (cartesian) with 0 deg meaning onshore and 180 offshore. The longshore component is not needed in 1D. This should be documented somewhere.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I had some issues (unrealistic erosion) with using the standard nautical wind file when doing some 1D simulations in Aeolis V3. It should be documented that the wind file for 1D is different than for 2D. In 2D simulations we can use the nautical wind direction with the use of alfa to correct for coastal orientation. In 1D simulations it is better to use the cartesian wind direction by transforming the nautical wind input to cross-shore components (cartesian) with 0 deg meaning onshore and 180 offshore. The longshore component is not needed in 1D. This should be documented somewhere.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: