Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change branch structure to that of Opencast #1411

Open
KatrinIhler opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Change branch structure to that of Opencast #1411

KatrinIhler opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
type:infrastructure Build process, deployment, workflows

Comments

@KatrinIhler
Copy link
Member

AS discussed in the Dev meeting and similar to opencast/opencast-admin-interface#229, we should adopt the branch structure of the main repository (so develop and version branches) so we can get bug fixes into the legacy releases without being blocked by breaking changes.

@KatrinIhler KatrinIhler added the type:infrastructure Build process, deployment, workflows label Jul 2, 2024
@mtneug
Copy link
Member

mtneug commented Jul 3, 2024

How would releases be tagged?

@KatrinIhler
Copy link
Member Author

Good question. Right now it's just the date, right? So I guess a combination of date and OC version would do?

@mtneug
Copy link
Member

mtneug commented Jul 3, 2024

Why include the date if we already have a major version? We could go to the typical number system, i.e.

{opencastMajorVersion}.{editorReleaseVersion}

So basically matching major versions of editor and Opencast are compatible. Or is this confusing?

@KatrinIhler
Copy link
Member Author

IMO we can only do this if the version numbers line up with those from Opencast, otherwise that could be confusing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:infrastructure Build process, deployment, workflows
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants