You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seeming extraordinarily unfair to always be seeing politicians at the top just because the last name begins with A first.
Also that if they're listed individually by attendance I'd like to see who's bottom of the pack in attendance just as much, if not more than as at the top.
Inverse sorting https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people?sort=attendance
For example sorting sort than alphabetical A-Z and attendance from 100 - 0.
Are these lists even a useful way to see or find people and the categories of information related to them?
If I'm logged in should I see my local member first, then the others? Can we aggregate the description, and better understand the distribution of attendance or the sorts that offer some insight over an identifier.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
It seeming extraordinarily unfair to always be seeing politicians at the top just because the last name begins with A first.
Also that if they're listed individually by attendance I'd like to see who's bottom of the pack in attendance just as much, if not more than as at the top.
Inverse sorting https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people?sort=attendance
For example sorting sort than alphabetical A-Z and attendance from 100 - 0.
Are these lists even a useful way to see or find people and the categories of information related to them?
If I'm logged in should I see my local member first, then the others? Can we aggregate the description, and better understand the distribution of attendance or the sorts that offer some insight over an identifier.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions