We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
QLD https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/pdf/inforce/current/act-2009-013
TAS http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/tas/consol_act/rtia2009234/
Several local and state bodies jurisdiction are covered by RTI but these are still referenced via FOI
This makes it possible for some public entities make it difficult by referring to use RTI terminology / statutes.
It would be helpful to update the relevant affect bodies to refer to RTI - just like GIPA is used in NSW
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This should already be the case (the code is here) but I can see it's not currently working.
I'm guessing there's been an upstream change that has broken the patch.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
QLD
https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/pdf/inforce/current/act-2009-013
TAS
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/tas/consol_act/rtia2009234/
Several local and state bodies jurisdiction are covered by RTI but these are still referenced via FOI
This makes it possible for some public entities make it difficult by referring to use RTI terminology / statutes.
It would be helpful to update the relevant affect bodies to refer to RTI - just like GIPA is used in NSW
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: