You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think the issue #15 is part of a bigger problem with conv_batch_norm in infogan/misc/custom_ops.py
First of all, I noticed that the following block of code in lines 126-128 in infogan/alogs/infogan_trainer.py does not actually invoke the test graph:
with pt.defaults_scope(phase=pt.Phase.test):
with tf.variable_scope("model", reuse=True) as scope:
self.visualize_all_factors()
I think the solution is to define a pt.UnboundVariable('phase') while making the templates, something along the lines of
with pt.defaults_scope(phase=pt.UnboundVariable('phase', default=pt.Phase.train)):
if network_type == "mnist":
with tf.variable_scope("d_net"):
template = pt.template("input")
train_output = template.construct(input=x_var)
test_output = template.construct(input=x_var, phase=pt.Phase.test)
Not using the test graph for visualization does not effect the MNIST images all that much, because the normalization from the test batch seems to work quite ok, but for larger images, it might have an impact. Have you checked this?
However, I also think there is a larger issue with the test graph of conv_batch_norm. I was not able to make it work even after fixing #15 , and had to change the code to something more like in the #official batch normalization layer.
Please check if I might be on to something. I have a pull request ready including a small script test_batch_norm.py to check whether the batch norm implementation is behaving reasonably.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think the issue #15 is part of a bigger problem with
conv_batch_norm
ininfogan/misc/custom_ops.py
First of all, I noticed that the following block of code in lines 126-128 in
infogan/alogs/infogan_trainer.py
does not actually invoke the test graph:I think the solution is to define a
pt.UnboundVariable('phase')
while making the templates, something along the lines ofNot using the test graph for visualization does not effect the MNIST images all that much, because the normalization from the test batch seems to work quite ok, but for larger images, it might have an impact. Have you checked this?
However, I also think there is a larger issue with the test graph of
conv_batch_norm
. I was not able to make it work even after fixing #15 , and had to change the code to something more like in the #official batch normalization layer.Please check if I might be on to something. I have a pull request ready including a small script
test_batch_norm.py
to check whether the batch norm implementation is behaving reasonably.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: