You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
More often than not, multiple elections take place at the same time or voters have multiple voices in the same election (e.g. one for a party and one for a candidate). In cases where those "types" can be asked the same questions, it makes sense to consolidate them in the same election compass. Otherwise users would have to either a) use two election compasses with the same questions or b) receive results of mixed types. To improve this situation, party "types" should be introduced.
Implementation
Add party types as a top-level configuration option besides parties, theses, etc.
Types should have a singular, a plural and an alias (slug)
Types should be optional
Add support for types to the configuration editor
It should be possible to add multiple types, before adding parties
If there are any types set, a party needs to have a type
Document the changes to the configuration file format
Add support for types in the client
The party store should store types
The party store should return a list of parties by type
The party section should show parties by type, if any
The party section should allow selection of all parties of a given type
The match section should display results by type, if any
The match section should display positions by type, if any
The match section should only display the positions of the first X parties by default
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
More often than not, multiple elections take place at the same time or voters have multiple voices in the same election (e.g. one for a party and one for a candidate). In cases where those "types" can be asked the same questions, it makes sense to consolidate them in the same election compass. Otherwise users would have to either a) use two election compasses with the same questions or b) receive results of mixed types. To improve this situation, party "types" should be introduced.
Implementation
types
as a top-level configuration option besidesparties
,theses
, etc.singular
, aplural
and an alias (slug)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: