-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
URLFWD
being replaced with REDIRECT
#87
Comments
Unfortunately, when this was added to octoDNS it was a single repo. This means the |
Has Cloudflare announced a similar deprecation? The octoDNS record type will hopefully be able to remain |
Cloudflare was planning to deprecate the specific I was thinking completeness when I made my comment. However, just updating what gets pushed/pulled from NS1 sounds like the quickest win. |
Apparently the "REDIRECT" records aren't actually a new record type, they're a completely separate object so this isn't going to be a drop in replacement. What's more they're not tied to a/per zone it's just a list of them so there's not a simple way to figure out what belongs in a zone during populate. I.e. if we see There's also a bunch of other details around support for https and forcing https. Anyway. I would classify this as a small project to support rather than something I can just sit down for an hour and churn out which is to say not sure when I'll get to it. |
Also by way of a note, if this is going to be something octoDNS transparently handles there will need to be some mechanics around an upgrade process that converts the URLFWD to its corresponding redirect and deletes the old URLFWD. That would be a change that couldn't be undone and thus users would not be able to downgrade octodns-ns1 afterwards. |
WIP/investigation branch can be found here https://github.com/octodns/octodns-ns1/compare/redirect?expand=1 Definitely a project. TBH more than I'm likely to pick up outside of someone funding it as there are lots of details and edge cases. |
Plan otherwise will be to remove support for URLFWD if/when NS1 removes it from their system assuming the work hasn't happened by then. I can see why Cloudflare changed their minds/delayed 😁 |
Is the work regarding this still in progress? NS1 will deprecate |
I started looking at this using your branch as a starting point. Are there missed commits not pushed to the working branch? |
Naw. It was a WIP halfway through some changes/thinking/experimentation. As mentioned above I think it'll be a decent chunk of work to get it all going and working correctly, especially in a. backwards compatible way. Something that could be done/I could do, but more than I'll have time to sit down and do absent someone footing the bill. Will definitely review PRs. It'll like require a pretty deep understanding of things to get plumbed out. |
That's fair. I have a fall back, which I don't want to use, if we can't get this updated soon. |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: