Unsat in Uberon caused by syncytiotrophoblast cell (CL:0000525) present_in_taxon Homo sapiens (NCBITaxon:9606)

[anitacaron]

Another day, another unsat.

• http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CL_0000525 in taxon http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon_9606 SubClassOf syncytiotrophoblast cell
  • syncytiotrophoblast cell SubClassOf part_of some placental labyrinth villous
    • placental labyrinth villous SubClassOf part_of some placenta labyrinth
      • placenta labyrinth SubClassOf in taxon some (not (Homo sapiens))
• http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CL_0000525 in taxon http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon_9606 SubClassOf in taxon some Homo sapiens
• part_of o part_of SubPropertyOf: overlaps
• overlaps o in taxon SubPropertyOf: in taxon
• in taxon some Homo sapiens DisjointWith in taxon some (not (Homo sapiens))

Two possible fixes here, I think:

• The human equivalent of the placenta labyrinth of rodents are the chorionic villi, so maybe Uberon could have a more generic term that encompasses both (something like “feto-maternal interdigitation”?), and that syncytiotrophoblast cell could be part_of.
• Make CL’s syncytiotrophoblast cell a part_of some syncytiotrophoblast, which exists both in rodents and humans (and which is already said, in Uberon, to be composed primarily of some syncytiotrophoblast cell), instead of the rodent-specific placental labyrinth villous.

Originally posted by @gouttegd in obophenotype/uberon#2928 (comment)

[aleixpuigb]

I will resolve it using the second proposed fix:

Make CL’s syncytiotrophoblast cell a part_of some syncytiotrophoblast, which exists both in rodents and humans (and which is already said, in Uberon, to be composed primarily of some syncytiotrophoblast cell), instead of the rodent-specific placental labyrinth villous.