only FQN is accepted as atom result, which is wrong

[yegor256]

Currently, we can't write this:

[] > foo /number

We can, but the number will be interpreted as Q.number. Let's add a resolver of atom result names, similar to how we resolve object names:

[] > foo
  number > x

Here, number means Q.org.eolang.number.

[yegor256]

@maxonfjvipon please, help