You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What I read here (https://www.objectionary.com/eo-phi-normalizer/docs/eo-phi-normalizer/dataize.html) is not accurate, both in the terminology it uses (what is "empty binding" or "value"?) and the process explained ("If the object is a formation that contains a ϕ-binding and no empty bindings, the result becomes the dataization of its attached object" -- this is not true, according to the current rules).
I suggest removing this description entirely, since it duplicates the content of the paper we have about and only confuses the reader. Let's just focus on the functionality of normalizer, leaving the logic of normalization to the rules, which are explained in the YAML file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What I read here (https://www.objectionary.com/eo-phi-normalizer/docs/eo-phi-normalizer/dataize.html) is not accurate, both in the terminology it uses (what is "empty binding" or "value"?) and the process explained ("If the object is a formation that contains a ϕ-binding and no empty bindings, the result becomes the dataization of its attached object" -- this is not true, according to the current rules).
I suggest removing this description entirely, since it duplicates the content of the paper we have about and only confuses the reader. Let's just focus on the functionality of normalizer, leaving the logic of normalization to the rules, which are explained in the YAML file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: