RAR object inside a TraT

[tulshi]

The following was suggested by Justin at the IETF 120 session on TraTs:
Paraphrasing: Justin suggested a way to include a RAR object itself.

[gffletch]

Email sent to the list... I'm not sure it makes sense to define this in the transaction token spec

[jricher]

RFC9396 already defines "authorization_details" for use at the top level of a JWT.

[gffletch]

@jricher are you suggesting that we call out that if you want to put a RAR object inside the tctx that you add the authorization_details claim at the top level of the tctx? I wouldn't want the authorization_details claim at the top-level of the TraT.