Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add smex-ido-M-x and smex-simple-M-x instead of old smex command #80

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

zonuexe
Copy link

@zonuexe zonuexe commented May 28, 2021

Initially smex was designed as an alternative to the excellent IDO-based M-x(execute-extended-command) command. However, there is actually a demand for another complementary interface like helm-smex.
These days, vertico and selectrum are examples, but they replace the completing-read command, so you don't need to create a separate package.

Add smex-M-x, smex-ido-M-x and smex-simple-M-x in this commit.
Traditional smex users believe that smex is based on IDO, so it's an alias for smex-ido-M-x. By binding the key to smex-M-x, the new user will automatically select either IDO or completing-read according to the state of ido-mode.

Initially smex was designed as an alternative to the excellent
IDO-based M-x(execute-extended-command) command. However, there is
actually a demand for another complementary interface like helm-smex.
These days, vertico and selectrum are examples, but they replace the
completing-read command, so you don't need to create a separate
package like helm-smex.

Add smex-M-x, smex-ido-M-x and smex-simple-M-x in this commit.
Traditional smex users believe that smex depends on IDO, so it's an
alias for smex-ido-M-x. By binding the key to smex-M-x, the new user
will automatically select either IDO or completing-read according to
the state of ido-mode.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant