Discussion re version 3.3 (and v 3.2) #3
eeholmes
started this conversation in
Team Posts
Replies: 2 comments
-
Thanks, Eli! By Github-SOP, we are talking about the nmfs-opensci SOP, correct? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Yes. This discussion thread is just specific to the nmfs-opensci SOP not the bigger vision discussion or any other SOPs. Over the weekend, I did another update to the nmfs-opensci SOP to make it clearer that this isn't a new SOP. This is trying to give pragmatic guidance and makes clear that local centers/offices might have their own SOPs. I added more links to the existing guidance too. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I edited the intro of the SOP because after getting Rick's feedback and Josh and my discussions last week, I realized that it sounded confrontational. The goal is to help staff understand and follow guidelines, but there are also lot of interpretation problems with the guidelines. Here is a presentation from PMEL. Not sure sure when I am guessing around 2018 or so. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zdSesY5QrkXHD2RVW_e8Wewed1gQf-Ki/view
I started this thread to try out using GitHub discussions instead of email. This is just for the GitHub-SOP doc and mainly for those working on it. The Visioning thread is on email.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions