-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Show commonness of words with level of commonness #544
Comments
This is a good point @Effiti ! I can pass this note to our lexicographers In the mean time, if you want to be apart of these conversations, you can join our meetings and conversations in Slack: https://nkowaokwu.com/volunteer |
@ijemmao |
@Effiti great! but I might have missed it~ hopefully you have the chance to send the message in the #software-engineers channel! would love to have you there 😊 |
@Effiti would you like to work on this ticket with our community translators? You would be able to update the code so that it handles a scale of frequency rather than a binary yes or no approach to determining word frequency |
@ijemmao sure, what do you have in mind? |
@Effiti we would need to use the
The minimum number for the word frequency scale is 1 while the highest number is 5 |
Ok, I will Fork the repo in a couple of days and start by implementing this migration. Maybe we should first merge that change, after that I will get in touch with the translators and other people interested in working on this in order to find ways to get good data on the frequency of words! |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The commonness of a word can be described more exactly than with a boolean.
Describe the solution you'd like
The German dictionary website "Duden" shows the commonness of a word on a scale of one to five.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A percentage of use could also be considered, but might lead to more complexity than needed, as words would probably be categorized into more rough categories subconsciously.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: