-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Using DiffusionGradientTable
on HCP-style acquisition
#128
Comments
I think so. The questions is basically to what order of magnitude should you be rounding the b-values. This is determined through an optional |
It seems like there are 2 places where the bvals are getting rescaled: 1 and 2 I was looking at how MRtrix3 handles this and they scale by the squared amplitude of the gradient vectors |
I ran into this issue again when working with the NTU-DSI-122 dataset. The MRtrix3
DiffusionGradientTable
I don't know as much about diffusion gradient scheme handling. But I was wondering whether we should even be rounding at all? If not, we could use clustering to assign b-values to shells (
Or by default, only round to the nearest 10? EDIT: Both of these solutions would fail in the HCP dataset I described earlier. |
Should this be the intended behaviour?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: