From 2a35f5bf82cc62294b257dacb3b656a18a0ab88b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Niema Moshiri Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:37:24 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] updates --- teach_online/academic_integrity.md | 16 +++++++++++++++- teach_online/ref.bib | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/teach_online/academic_integrity.md b/teach_online/academic_integrity.md index d056d50..9b5f502 100644 --- a/teach_online/academic_integrity.md +++ b/teach_online/academic_integrity.md @@ -10,4 +10,18 @@ Some content in this chapter may overlap with other chapters (e.g. if we discuss Academic Integrity when we introduce specific online assessment tools), but this chapter will be structured in a way that is hopefully agnostic to specific tooling. -TODO CONTINUE HERE +## Exams + +One of the most frequent concerns I have heard regarding maintaining +Academic Integrity in online courses is with respect to online exams. +Instructors often rely on exams to serve as comprehensive evaluations of student mastery, +and ensuring the integrity of this form of evaluation is an important goal. + +### Remote Proctoring + +When administering online exams, +especially in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, +many instructors relied on {term}`Remote Proctoring`, +in which students take an exam on a computer +while being supervised by a person and/or computer software +{cite:p}`eaton_remote_2024`. diff --git a/teach_online/ref.bib b/teach_online/ref.bib index 617e78c..3e54c8e 100644 --- a/teach_online/ref.bib +++ b/teach_online/ref.bib @@ -305,4 +305,24 @@ @book{beatty_hybrid-flexible_2019 author = {Beatty, Brian}, year = {2019}, doi = {10.59668/33}, + file = {Beatty - 2019 - Hybrid-Flexible Course Design.pdf:C\:\\Users\\a1moshir\\Zotero\\storage\\WKIA6E73\\Beatty - 2019 - Hybrid-Flexible Course Design.pdf:application/pdf}, +} + +@incollection{eaton_remote_2024, + address = {Cham}, + title = {Remote {Proctoring}: {Understanding} the {Debate}}, + isbn = {978-3-031-54143-8 978-3-031-54144-5}, + shorttitle = {Remote {Proctoring}}, + url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_150}, + language = {en}, + urldate = {2024-04-11}, + booktitle = {Second {Handbook} of {Academic} {Integrity}}, + publisher = {Springer Nature Switzerland}, + author = {Dawson, Phillip}, + editor = {Eaton, Sarah Elaine}, + year = {2024}, + doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_150}, + note = {Series Title: Springer International Handbooks of Education}, + pages = {1511--1526}, + file = {Dawson - 2024 - Remote Proctoring Understanding the Debate.pdf:C\:\\Users\\a1moshir\\Zotero\\storage\\HLYDTWX9\\Dawson - 2024 - Remote Proctoring Understanding the Debate.pdf:application/pdf}, }