You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, could you plz suggest the training and test config parameters for Cambridge Landmarks dataset? The default config works quite good for 7 scenes, but test performance for Cambridge Landmarks is not that good. Did you use different training parameters?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, the default config is not great on the Cambridge Landmarks dataset, we ran some analysis in the paper and found that using a simple ensemble model (where the scene is split into multiple disjoint clusters and an ACE network is trained for each cluster) we could get much better performance.
You can try using this script to to train an ensemble of 4 ACE models: ./scripts/train_cambridge_ensemble.sh 4. That should replicate our paper results.
You can also play with the training parameters, e.g. increasing the number of training iterations/buffer size/batch size, etc...
Hello, could you plz suggest the training and test config parameters for Cambridge Landmarks dataset? The default config works quite good for 7 scenes, but test performance for Cambridge Landmarks is not that good. Did you use different training parameters?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: