You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since this library is part of Nestjs core, It would be great to have a feature allowing us to just define our method in controllers without having the @get(), @post parts of the stuff.
Then we'll have a separate route file leveraging this library.
The route file would have a structure like this:
const routes: Routes = [
{
path: '/my-awesome-route',
// Here we have a syntax "ControllerClass:MethodToCallInController"
controller: 'MyAwesomeRouteController:getSomeAwesomeThing',
method: 'GET'
}
]
My controller would then go like this:
// Maybe this @Controller could also be get rid of when this feature got implemented
@Controller()
export class MyAwesomeRouteController {
constructor() { }
async getSomeAwesomeThing(): Promise<AwesomeThing> {
return { "data": "some awesome things" }
}
}
Thank you so much for all you're doing to improve our DX.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That could work, we can derive the @Method for them form the information we have, but what you would do with the extra functionality provided by the @Get for example? Yeah that could work, but it will be so limited. wdyt?
Not an issue but I have a suggestion.
Since this library is part of Nestjs core, It would be great to have a feature allowing us to just define our method in controllers without having the @get(), @post parts of the stuff.
Then we'll have a separate route file leveraging this library.
The route file would have a structure like this:
My controller would then go like this:
Thank you so much for all you're doing to improve our DX.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: