-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 228
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
get_cell
to reoslve OutPoint
#4658
Comments
Lines 75 to 79 in 44afc93
Is it impossible to resolve this issue with dead cells because dead cells in RocksDB always be deleted from Or we can query deadcell from |
To achieve the feature, I'm extracting the cell from the corresponding transaction using the following code: tx_hash = []
for input in inputs:
tx_hash.append(input.previous_output.tx_hash)
txs = batch_and_chunk('get_transaction', tx_hash, chunk_size)
zip_with(inputs, txs, zip_func) However, there are some challenges with this approach:
|
@homura Hello. Could you describe the "use case" in which you need to query DeadCell? |
We are developing a data aggregation layer to retrieve historical data from the blockchain, including CKB. A component of this project, called sync, extracts data from the blockchain block by block and converts the transactions into human-readable actions. These actions include native and derived asset minting, transfers, burns, DeFi swaps, liquidity operations, and more. We use the Another project from a long time ago was an asset bridge, which had no backend and used CKB RPC directly, and in the transaction history we also needed to render from and to information, which was also a user story |
To provide functionality such as querying “which transaction spent a cell”, the ckb node would need to keep track of the referential relationship of each dead cell, this will significantly increase storage requirements and IO overhead. CKB's rpc design is same as Bitcoin, focus on maintaining the UTXO set only, as this helps to speed up the transaction verification process, complex queries are often considered to be within the scope of functionality of third-party services such as block browsers and analytics platforms. |
I want to clarify that the feature request is to resolve (dead) cells by |
Feature Request
In some dApp scenarios, it's necessary to resolve a cell even if the cell has already been consumed. This is needed for tasks such as analyzing the purpose of a transaction and rendering transaction records that include both the sender and recipient.
Developers currently have to resolve an
OutPoint
by fetching an entire transaction and then extracting the corresponding cell from itsoutputs
. This becomes challenging when the pointed transaction is largeIs your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Describe the solution you'd like
Add a new RPC similar to
get_live_cell
without the status of the cellRequest
Response
Describe alternatives you've considered
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: