-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"such" in legalese: D? Determiner? #136
Comments
e.g. nert-nlp/legal-cgel#34 "If the adverse party is a resident of the district within which the award was made, such service shall be made..." |
I guess I thought it was a determinative 16 years ago: |
I guess AdjPs cannot otherwise be determiners (p. 355), so it is reasonable to explain this by adding "such" to the determinative category. |
agreed |
Also: "said" as in "said term" |
I know @BrettRey has opinions on this. :) |
Really seems like such is a D: PROVIDED, HOWEVER, That this article shall not be so construed as to forbid the employment by the state of a chaplain for such of the state custodial, correctional, and mental institutions, or by a county's or public hospital district's hospital, health care facility, or hospice, as in the discretion of the legislature may seem justified. |
And, yes, said too. |
CGEL p. 1546 characterizes "such" as an adjective (even when a predeterminer). Footnote 54 notes legal register uses like "such term" meaning 'this term', but doesn't explicitly comment on the category or function. It seems to be filling the Determiner slot, so maybe Det:AdjP?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: