Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistencies in task names #150

Open
FlorentinD opened this issue Dec 17, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Inconsistencies in task names #150

FlorentinD opened this issue Dec 17, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
good first issue Indicates a good issue for first-time contributors

Comments

@FlorentinD
Copy link
Contributor

We have noticed some tasks names are lowercase and some are uppercase. This is related to progress tracking, these descriptions show up in our logging (more at https://neo4j.com/docs/graph-data-science/current/common-usage/logging/).

Example:
For Modularity Optimization we define a task with lower-cases initialization, while for FastRP we capitalize the name such as Initialize random vectors.

We should make sure the naming and formatting is consistent.

@FlorentinD FlorentinD added the good first issue Indicates a good issue for first-time contributors label Dec 17, 2021
@airtyon
Copy link
Contributor

airtyon commented Jan 9, 2023

hi @FlorentinD, may I give this one a try if it's still available?

@FlorentinD
Copy link
Contributor Author

I mean you could, but honestly its quite tedious and I am not sure very interesting for you.

I will talk with the others if we have some other ideas for you.
Do you have a particular interest? :)

@airtyon
Copy link
Contributor

airtyon commented Jan 15, 2023

To be honest I got introduced to Neo just 2 months ago.
Regarding my Interests, I would like to get to know the technology as a whole and contribute; and I thought the best way of doing it is to start small.

@FlorentinD
Copy link
Contributor Author

FlorentinD commented Jan 18, 2023

@airtyon Nice to hear you then got interested in contributing 👍

I added 2 new good first issues to this repository.
#242 and #243 are a bit more interesting I would say.
Alternatively, we are also starting to add good first issues to our python client (https://github.com/neo4j/graph-data-science-client).

@TheMellyBee
Copy link

I'm happy to grab this one. It's easy and just needs done while watching a christmas movie or two :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Indicates a good issue for first-time contributors
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants