Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 19, 2024. It is now read-only.

Documentation and deployment scenario for cluster internal ssl #99

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

eastlondoner
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

metadata:
name: cluster-internal-ssl-config
data:
NEO4J_unsupported_dbms_ssl_system_ignore__dot__files: "true"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does k8s do something funky with the volume mappings? Or why is this needed? I don't see any dotfiles in what you're mounting

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, yes it does, K8s creates the directories for the configmaps/secrets in its own locations and symlinks to them. It stores metadata in dot files which gets included.

The main reason for the wizardry is that they can update the symlink for a whole directory atomically at runtime if the ConfigMap or Secret is changed - obviously that's not relevant to Neo4j but there's no way to turn it off in K8s.

@moxious
Copy link
Contributor

moxious commented Sep 7, 2020

PR is on hold because it requires release of Neo4j 4.1.2 to work in all aspects. For this reason it won't be released as part of 4.1.1-*. But ready for merge when the new version is available.

@moxious moxious added enhancement New feature or request on hold labels Sep 7, 2020
@eastlondoner eastlondoner changed the title added deployment scenario for cluster internal ssl Documentation and deployment scenario for cluster internal ssl Sep 8, 2020
@moxious
Copy link
Contributor

moxious commented Oct 9, 2020

note - needs verification against 4.1.2, or otherwise a helm version bump to 4.1.3 where it should work. @moxious to confirm

@eastlondoner eastlondoner self-assigned this Mar 25, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request on hold
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants