You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It looks like the current implementation is relatively tied to AWS, but in the long term is there any chance that llama could be extended to support GCP (Google Cloud Run + Google Cloud Storage look like a nearly drop-in replacement for lambda/s3) or even an arbitrary docker host/hosts and arbitrary s3-compatible object store?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's totally possible. S3 is already mostly hidden behind the store.Store interface, but you'd need to add a few shims/interfaces in other places. The actual surface area for interacting with AWS -- other than the initial configuration bootstrap -- is fairly small, so I don't think it would be a huge project.
gg reported substantially better results on Lambda than on Google Cloud Run, though, which is the main reason I chose to target it first.
It looks like the current implementation is relatively tied to AWS, but in the long term is there any chance that llama could be extended to support GCP (Google Cloud Run + Google Cloud Storage look like a nearly drop-in replacement for lambda/s3) or even an arbitrary docker host/hosts and arbitrary s3-compatible object store?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: