Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Documentation, possibly for the main README] llama versus distcc #19

Open
rubyFeedback opened this issue May 21, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@rubyFeedback
Copy link

I noticed your comment, linked in via reddit recently.

You mentioned distcc. I think this is where many users may have the question
what sets llama apart from distcc; or conversely, why use llama rather than
distcc. In particular when it comes to inertia to change, they may prefer to
stick to distcc even if it is inferior, simply because they know it better (or
for some other reasons). It would be nice if the main README, or some
other document, could mention differences and use cases. Does not have
to be long, a medium paragraph should easily suffice.

PS: And the name is also peculiar, could explain the name "llama". Though
that could perhaps go into a FAQ or wiki.

@yjftsjthsd-g
Copy link

Likewise, a comparison to gg would be helpful; it looks less polished, but it doesn't seem "not widely accessible at present"?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants