New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

It appears that the nanopass framework will discard an extra argument in a cata if there is a transformer that matches #5

Open

akeep opened this issue Dec 26, 2016 · 0 comments

Assignees

Member

akeep commented Dec 26, 2016

Found an example where we had a pass like this:

(define-pass ---
  (Foo : Foo (x) -> Foo ()
     ---)
  (Bar : Bar (x y) -> Bar ()
    [(form ,[foo y -> foo]) `(form ,foo)])

And it was matching. It may also require extra return values, since the example pass had that form.

akeep self-assigned this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment