Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update 1 NuGet dependencies #17

Merged

Conversation

nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Nov 21, 2024

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 2.1.113 to 3.0.42

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the dependency version for nanoFramework.TestFramework to enhance compatibility and performance.

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 2.1.113 to 3.0.42</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve an update to the packages.lock.json file, specifically for the nanoFramework.TestFramework dependency. The requested and resolved versions have been changed from 2.1.113 to 3.0.42, and the content hash has been updated to reflect this new version.

Changes

File Change Summary
Tests/System.IO.HashingTests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.TestFramework dependency version from 2.1.113 to 3.0.42, including changes to the content hash.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update 1 NuGet dependencies #13: This PR updates the nanoFramework.TestFramework from version 2.1.107 to 2.1.111, which is a direct predecessor to the version change in the main PR from 2.1.113 to 3.0.42.
  • Update 1 NuGet dependencies #14: This PR updates the nanoFramework.TestFramework from version 2.1.111 to 2.1.112, which is also relevant as it leads up to the version change in the main PR.
  • Update 1 NuGet dependencies #15: This PR updates the nanoFramework.TestFramework from version 2.1.112 to 2.1.113, making it directly related to the versioning changes in the main PR.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a6ff014 and 0ee403a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • Tests/System.IO.HashingTests/System.IO.HashingTests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/System.IO.HashingTests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Tests/System.IO.HashingTests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Tests/System.IO.HashingTests/packages.lock.json (1)

19-21: Verify compatibility with major version upgrade

The update from TestFramework 2.1.113 to 3.0.42 represents a major version bump which might introduce breaking changes in the test infrastructure.

Let's verify the impact:

✅ Verification successful

Safe to proceed with the TestFramework update

The test code uses standard MSTest patterns (TestClass, TestMethod, DataRow attributes) and basic assertions that are stable across major versions. The implementation is straightforward and doesn't use any advanced or version-specific features that would be affected by breaking changes.

  • Test file Tests/System.IO.HashingTests/Crc32Tests.cs uses:
    • Basic attributes: [TestClass], [TestMethod], [DataRow]
    • Simple assertions: Assert.AreEqual
    • Standard test output: OutputHelper.WriteLine
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential breaking changes and test files that might need updates

# Look for test files that might be affected
echo "Searching for test files..."
fd -e cs -e vb --type f . Tests/

# Check for common test attributes or base classes that might have changed
echo "Checking test patterns that might need updates..."
rg -l "TestMethod|TestClass|TestInitialize|TestCleanup|Assert\." Tests/

Length of output: 424


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the test file content to understand the usage patterns
echo "Checking test file content..."
cat Tests/System.IO.HashingTests/Crc32Tests.cs

# Also check if there's a changelog or release notes for the test framework
echo "Searching for changelog or release notes..."
rg -i "changelog|breaking.*changes|migration" .

Length of output: 2998


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 21, 2024

@nfbot nfbot merged commit 1220c60 into main Nov 21, 2024
6 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/5d200edf-eb86-408e-98b6-86bb77ced8b9 branch November 21, 2024 10:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant