Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update 1 NuGet dependencies #14

Merged

Conversation

nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Sep 23, 2024

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 2.1.111 to 2.1.112

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the nanoFramework.TestFramework package version from 2.1.111 to 2.1.112.

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 2.1.111 to 2.1.112</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the version of the nanoFramework.TestFramework package in the packages.lock.json file from 2.1.111 to 2.1.112. This change includes an updated resolved version and a modified content hash to reflect the new package version.

Changes

File Change Summary
Tests/System.IO.HashingTests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.TestFramework version from 2.1.111 to 2.1.112.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update 1 NuGet dependencies #13: This PR updates the nanoFramework.TestFramework package from version 2.1.107 to 2.1.111, which is directly related to the main PR that updates the package from 2.1.111 to 2.1.112.

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c1a07a5 and a3ebe03.

Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • Tests/System.IO.HashingTests/System.IO.HashingTests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/System.IO.HashingTests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
Files selected for processing (1)
  • Tests/System.IO.HashingTests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
Tests/System.IO.HashingTests/packages.lock.json (1)

19-21: LGTM: Version update is consistent and aligns with PR objectives.

The nanoFramework.TestFramework package has been successfully updated from version 2.1.111 to 2.1.112. This change is consistent across both the "requested" and "resolved" fields, and the content hash has been appropriately updated. The modification aligns perfectly with the stated PR objectives.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 23, 2024

@nfbot nfbot merged commit 6e75f5a into main Sep 23, 2024
6 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/33f60728-b93f-42e1-92d5-2bf334048c1e branch September 23, 2024 10:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant